#Shantae gba palette ps3#

Put as many options as your heart desires. 'I especially found that comment amusing since even Final Fantasy Tactics had, essentially, a saturation toggle in-game depending on what GBA you were using.'Д®xactly. If you call the SP+ colours vibrant and not oversaturated, I sincerely question your position in the gaming industry. There's a BIG difference between vibrancy and oversaturation. But hey, most people can't notice the difference so who cares?Д®ven Craig Harris, whom I disagree with quite often, said in his SP+ article that the refresh is worse (I haven't touched on that yet) and that the colours are more saturated/powerful - which he refers to as a 'trade-off'. Ever compared VGA to DVI on an LCD? Can you see the difference? It's night and day.

When Microsoft released the specs for their 360 and it didn't have a digital video output (DVI/HDMI), I complained about that and people argued that there's no real difference. You say I'm in the minority, right? You're abolutely right. Sure it's an opinion, but being extremely anal about LCDs, colour-schemes, home theatres etc, I'd say I do know a few things.

#Shantae gba palette ps3#

Everyone I've shown the SP+ and Micro to, including many people at IBM in Rochester, MN (where they designed the XBOX 360, PS3 etc.) who actually know a few things about electronics, have agreed that the colour scheme is plain off on the SP+. I especially found that comment amusing since even Final Fantasy Tactics had, essentially, a saturation toggle in-game depending on what GBA you were using. Heaven forbid there could be an extra button on the GBA to switch between two colour schemes. If you owned a Micro and could directly compare these games, you'd surely agree.Д¬lick to expand.I was hoping this wouldn't degenerate into an insult-throwing match. I absolutely 100% refuse to believe that anyone can happily play Golden Sun on the SP+ without cringing. And by that reasoning, if games were created for the SP, they can't look the same on the SP+. Clearly, if all GBA games were designed for the original GBA, they can't also look the 'same' on the SP. And clearly, many games do not look better on the SP+. At the end of the day, the GBA is about making money, clearly. And if the GBA is about efficiency, why are there only two brightness settings on the SP+ and five on the Micro. If the GBA is about efficiency, how can there be such a huge difference between the SP+ and the Micro? And if the GBA is about efficiency, why are there MANY iterations of the GBA. It's nigh on IMPOSSIBLE to play games like Golden Sun on the SP+. I really am astonished that anyone can argue that the GBA games on the SP+ don't look oversaturated. And I'd wager money that you're in an incredibly small minority, even here, with your 'oversaturation' complaints. Nintendo's going to add a switch to swap between something barely noticable and confuse the consumers? GBA is about efficiency. 'However, I still maintain and stand by my original post that there should be an option on the SP+ hardware to 'dull' the colours because they are too vivid on the SP+ because games weren't designed for that screen!' The game I'm directing right now I'm testing on SP+ and the art looks great onscreen. It's not oversaturation, it's not higher contrast, it's just playing it by ear.

We just make art and check it on hardware, and tweak it to look best on hardware. I was also probably oversimplifying the situation when I said that we oversaturate games. I definitely don't consider any game I've ever played on SP+ to be noticably ugly. I also prefer the fact that I'm seeing the original art because that interests me. So why the concern? You prefer the micro? I've played both and I prefer the SP+. To me, games look better than ever on SP+.